Occurrence Details


Occurrence Number:
105G 117
Occurrence Name:
Kudz Ze Kayah
Occurrence Type:
Hard-rock
Status:
Deposit
Date printed:
9/19/2024 9:32:02 PM

Print Options


General Information
Capsule
Work History
Assessment Reports
References
Resource / Reserve
Drill Core

General Information

Primary Commodities: copper, gold, lead, silver, zinc
Aliases: Abm, Kzk, Tag
Deposit Type(s): Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) Kuroko Cu-Pb-Zn
Location(s): 61°27'29" N - -130°36'36" W
NTS Mapsheet(s): 105G07
Hand Samples Available: Yes
Last Reviewed: Nov 25, 2016

Capsule

WORK HISTORY

Cominco's interest in the Finlayson Lake area was heightened in 1992 when soil and silt geochemical sample results from a reconnaissance program confirmed and expanded upon an anomalous silt sample collected during a Geological Survey of Canada regional stream sediment and water geochemical survey for NTS map sheet 105G (Hornbook and Friske, 1988).
 
A follow up program, in 1993, within the anomalous drainage led to the discovery of a mineralized sulphide cobble by A.B. Mawer of Cominco, for whom the deposit is named. The company immediately carried out a reconnaissance ground UTEM geophysical survey over the projected trace of the suspected host stratigraphy, thereby outlining an EM conductor. Staking of the first Tag claims (cl 1-30, (YB46227) over the conductor was accompanied by a ground magnetic survey. Further magnetic and horizontal loop EM and soil surveys were completed later, that fall defining a compelling drill target.
 
In 1994 Cominco flew an airborne magnetic/electric magnetic (EM) survey over the property and followed up identified anomalies with ground magnetics and gravity surveys, regional and detailed mapping and additional soil sampling. The company also collared 53 diamond drill holes (8,500 m) on and around the main ABM zone/deposit, staked more than 1,591 claims and released a preliminary historic mineral reserve estimate for the ABM deposit at the end of the year.

In 1995 Cominco drilled 133 diamond drill holes (16,178 m), and carried out additional soil sampling, ground HLEM, magnetic and gravity geophysical surveys and geological mapping. The company also constructed an all-weather tote road to the property, collected a 40 tonne bulk sample and initiated various engineering, metallurgical, geotechnical, heritage, environmental and archaeological studies. An updated historical mineral resource estimate was released at the end of 1995.
 
In 1996 Cominco carried out regional geological mapping outside the immediate area of the ABM deposit and ground HLEM magnetic and gravity geophysical and soil sampling surveys over the northeast portion of the property. The company also upgraded the tote road, completed minor diamond drilling (99 m) in the southwest corner of the property and continued the various studies initiated the previous year. In 1997, Cominco completed ground UTEM and magnetic geophysical surveys on the Kudz Ze Kayah property and collared 17 diamond drill holes (5,360 m).  

In 1998 Cominco carried out additional soil sampling and ground geophysical surveys and collared 11 diamond drill holes(1,755 m) on and around the GP4F zone (Minfile Occurrence 105G 143), located approximately 5 km to the southeast. In addition the company flew an airborne EM and magnetic survey over the eastern half of the R-15 land claim block (a block of land under interim Land Claim protection and claimed by the Ross River Dena Council) located approximately 5.5 km to the southeast. At the end of the year the company released an initial historical mineral resource estimate for the newly named GP4F deposit.
 
During the 1999 exploration season Cominco carried out ground In-Loop UTEM and HLEM/magnetic geophysical surveys over and around the GP4F deposit. Other than minor environmental monitoring and site remediation, no further physical work was carried out on the property until its sale in 2015.

In Mar/2000 Cominco announced an agreement in principal to sell the Kudz Ze Kayah and the neighboring GP4F deposits and surrounding mineral claims to Expatriate Resources Ltd. During 2000 Expatriate completed a pre-feasibility study (Hatch Associates Ltd, 2000), the emphasis of which was the co-development of both companies’ deposits located within the Finlayson Lake region. A revised resource and mineable reserve for Kudz Ze Kayah was released, based on a mining scenario that included both the Kudz Ze Kayah and the Wolverine deposits.
 
In Jul/2001 Cominco merged with Teck Corp to form Teck Cominco Ltd. In Sep/2001, Expatriate terminated its agreement and returned all mineral properties to Teck Cominco. Despite the termination of the agreement, both companies pushed for the creation of an "area play" to bring the regions various properties into production. In 2004 Cominco signed a Socio-Economic Participation Agreement with the Ross River Dena Council on behalf of the Kaska Nation.
 
In December 2004, Expatriate reorganized and changed its name to Yukon Zinc Corporation.
 
In Apr/2009 Teck Cominco Ltd changed its name to Teck Resources Ltd. 

On January 24, 2015 BMC Minerals (No. 1) Ltd, a private British based company purchased the Kudz Ze Kayah property including the GP4F zone. At the time of purchase the company released a historical mineral resource estimate based on Cominco’s last publicly reported estimate (2009).
 
Prior to commencement of the 2015 field season BMC Minerals rehabilitated the tote road, constructed a new camp, initiated a data compilation program and began re-logging historic diamond drill core. Upon the start of the field program the company carried out an airborne Li-DAR survey and GPS surveyed the position of the tote road and all historic drill collars. BMC Minerals flew an airborne EM and magnetic survey over the property and carried out ground gravity geophysical surveys over the ABM and GP4F deposits and the Rhyolite Peak area. Down-hole EM surveys were completed on seven diamond drill holes in the GP4F area and one exploration hole.
 
BMC Minerals collared 99 diamond drill holes (21,279.7 m) in 2015 considered exploration in nature. Fifty-nine hole targeted the ABM deposit, 30 holes tested targets proximal to the deposit and 10 holes tested the GP4F deposit. The company also drilled 29 diamond drill holes (3,406 m) for metallurgical testing, 9 geotechnical drill holes (955 m) and 11 shallow hydrological holes (325 m). BMC Minerals also restarted hydrological, environmental, heritage other studies previously implemented by Cominco.
 
On January 18, 2016 BMC Minerals released a JORC compliant (Australasian Code for Reporting Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves) updated mineral resource estimate for the ABM and GP4F deposits.
 
During the 2016 exploration season BMC Minerals carried out an additional 19,000 m of diamond drilling. On November 2016 the company released a JORC compliant (Australasian Code for Reporting Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves) updated mineral resource estimate. The new resource estimate will form the basis of a Prefeasibility Study due to be released in late 2016. 

CAPSULE GEOLOGY

The Kudz Ze Kayah property lies within Yukon-Tanana terrane near the center of the Finlayson Lake area. It hosts the ABM and GP4F (Minfile Occurrence 105G 143), volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits. Volcanic massive sulphide mineralization is hosted by felsic volcanic and variably carbonaceous sedimentary rocks assigned to the Kudz Ze Kayah Formation, part of the Upper Devonian to Lower Mississippian (?) Grass Lakes Succession. The deposits are hosted by different stratigraphic levels of this formation.
 
The host metavolcanic complex is a thick felsic fragmental and sill/flow sequence with minor mafic sills and flows and rare interlayered metasedimentary rocks (Schultze and Hall, 1997). The metavolcanic sequence has been structurally thickened to about 1000 m and is made up dominantly of felsic tuffs, felsic flows, feldspar + quartz metaintrusive rocks, feldspar augen crystal tuff, and undifferentiated mafic metavolcanic rocks. Felsic metatuffs are most abundant. Metarhyolite flows and associated dikes and sills are thickest, most abundant and best exposed on the ridge west of the deposit. They are typically dense, siliceous and aphanitic and locally contain up to 70%, 5 - 25 mm diameter spherulites. Feldspar augen crystal metatuffs exposed on ridges southeast of the deposit are apparently on strike with the metarhyolite unit. Ribboned, thinly banded siliceous felsic meta-ash tuff rocks are rare in outcrop and appear to be proximal to the deposit.

Presently the ABM deposit consists of the ABM zone and the Krakatoa zone which are separated by the north-northeast striking East Fault. The ABM lens is defined as a massive sulphide and stringer-style sulphide mineralization primarily hosted within a package of felsic volcanic rocks that occurs in the immediate hanging wall to a chlorite altered mafic schist while the Krakatoa zone is primarily hosted at or near the lower contact of the mafic schist.
 
The ABM lens consists of polymetallic massive and stringer type mineralization that measures up to 39 m in true thickness, strikes approximately 290° and has a minimum strike length of 700 m. It consists of a series of stacked lenses that coalesce into a single mineralized horizon at its eastern end. The lens dips at approximately 35° to the north with a 400 m down dip extent, with a flexure occurring around 200 m down dip that flattens the dip to 10 to 15°. Sulphide mineralization is dominated by pyrite, sphalerite, pyrrhotite, galena and chalcopyrite, with gangue minerals consisting of chlorite, magnetite, quartz, iron-carbonate, calcite, sericite, cordierite, albite, celsian and barite. Mineralized lenses typically occur within an envelope of chlorite and muscovite alteration and are subdivided into massive and stringer/disseminated sulphide styles. The mineralization responds well to magnetic and electromagnetic surveys but geochemical response is somewhat erratic due to the glacial till cover.
 
The Krakatoa zone was delineated by the 2015 diamond drilling program and lies south of the ABM deposit, in between the East and Sunda faults. The zone is predominantly hosted within a pre-mineralized mafic sill that intrudes the felsic volcanic package. Mineralization also occurs in the hanging wall to the mafic sill at Krakatoa in what is interpreted to be the equivalent of the ABM mineralized position. Only minor mineralization occurs in the mafic unit stratigraphically beneath the ABM zone. The Krakatoa zone lies under about 30 m of glacial overburden and is up to 22 m in true thickness and remains open to depth. BMC Minerals 2016 updated mineral resource estimate elevated the zone to deposit status.

The UTEM, magnetic and HLEM geophysical and soil surveys completed in 1993 successfully defined a drill target. The target was drilled in Apr/94 and the first hole intersected 22.5 m of sulphides in two zones which returned a weighted average grade of 0.5% copper, 2.8% lead, 10% zinc, 278 g/t silver and 2.9 g/t gold. The company collared an additional 51 diamond drill holes in 1994 the results of which were used to calculate a historical estimate released in Feb/2005.
 
Cominco released annual historical resource estimates covering the years 1995 through 1999 which were slightly less than the historical resource estimate released for 1994. The decrease likely reflects that the 1994 figure included open pit and underground resources while the latter figures reflects an open pit mineable historical resource estimate. In addition the 1994 figure was classified as a “Possible Reserves” while the latter figures were classified as “Measured and Indicated Reserves”. The 1995 Yukon Exploration and Geology volume reports a slightly lower historical resource figure but similar grades to the annual reports. This likely reflects a reporting error. In 1998 Cominco published a historical estimate for the GP4F deposit (see Minfile Occurrence 105G 143), which some mining publications have included within the ABM deposit.
 
The 2000 Hatch Canada report prepared for Expatriate Resources Ltd was published as a Pre-Feasibility study for the Finlayson Project, which envisioned mining the Kudz Ze Kayah and neighboring Wolverine (Minfile Occurrence 105G 072) deposits as one. Various preliminary mining, milling and tailing disposal studies were undertaken to prepare a preliminary cost estimate for the project under the assumption that project costs would be cheaper if both deposits were developed at the same time. The study assumed the Kudz Ze Kayah deposit would be mined as an open pit mine. The study calculated a historical Indicated mineral resource estimate based on overall resources and a lower historical Probable reserve based on a preliminary mining plan. The lower Probable reserve resulted from some of the mineral resources being remove because they existed outside of the mine plan. As this report was completed before the release of National Instrument 43-101 regulations all reserve and resource figure are considered Historical Estimates.

Although the Hatch mineral resource figures were widely published, Cominco continued to publish the 1998 Historical Indicated and Inferred mineral resource figures in their annual reports. In the 2006 annual report Cominco changed all the resource figures to Inferred mineral resources and included the GP4F resource. This change likely resulted from the realization that the co-development of the Kudz Ze Kayah and Wolverine mines would not go forward thus assumptions used by Hatch in 2000 were invalid. It appears that Teck stop publicly reporting a mineral resource for the property after the end of the 2009 fiscal year.
 
In its January 24, 2015 news release announcing the purchase of the Kudz Ze Kayah property from Cominco, BMC Minerals released a Historical estimate of 12,800,000 tonnes of ore. This figure which is not NI 43-101 compliant, copies the 2006 resource estimate published in Teck Cominco’s 2006 annual report and likely includes resources assigned to the GP4F deposit.
 
BMC Minerals spent the late winter and spring of 2015 compiling historical data, re-logging historic drill core interpreting geophysical data and planning for the field season. The diamond drill program focused on increasing reserves and obtaining metallurgical samples and engineering and hydrogeological data.
 
On January 22, 2016, BMC Minerals released a JORC Code compliant (Australasian Code for Reporting Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves) mineral resource estimate for the Kudz Ze Kayah property. JORC Code is derived from the Joint Ore Reporting Committee, an independent mineral industry body from Australian based industry professional associates while NI 43-101 code is derived from Canadian Securities Authorities. 
 
The new resource estimate included the newly identified Krakatoa deposit located immediately adjacent to the existing ABM deposit. The company broke the resource estimate down by zone, Indicated/Inferred and by massive and stockwork mineralization. The new figures do not include a cut-off grade as mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork sulphide lithologies. These zones correlate d to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis the company deemed that no cut-off grade was required (see News Release January 22, 2016 for details concerning resource estimate). The company also included an Inferred mineral resource estimate for the GP4F deposit.
 
Metallurgical studies released in July 2016 confirmed that the deposit could be processed using a simple circuit design and conventional flotation processing to produce separate copper, lead and zinc concentrates carrying precious metal credits.  The ore carries low amount of deleterious elements and penalties associated with such elements are considered minimal. Preliminary discussions with metal traders determined the project would produce a marketable concentrate.
 
Upon completion of the 2016 drill program BMC Minerals released an updated JORC Code compliant mineral resource for the Kudz Ze Kayah property. Total tonnes report were slightly less than the figure released in January 2016, however 95% of the resource was classified upwards into the Indicated class. The company also included a separate updated JORC Code compliant mineral resource for the GP4F deposit in which most of the mineral resource was classified upwards into the Indicated class.
 
The ABM Deposit (ABM  and Krakatoa zones) currently hosts (November 2016) a total resource (Indicated and Inferred) of 19,200,000 tonnes. BMC Minerals plans to release a Prefeasibility Study by the end of 2016. 




 

Work History

Date Work Type Comment
12/31/2000 Studies Hatch, 2000. Plan to mine Kudz Ze Kayah and Wolverine deposits together.
12/31/1998 Geology
12/31/1998 Geochemistry Additional sampling.
12/31/1997 Drilling 17 holes (5,360 m).
12/31/1997 Studies
12/31/1997 Ground Geophysics Also UTEM survey.
12/31/1996 Ground Geophysics Also HLEM survey.
12/31/1996 Drilling 1 hole (99 m).
12/31/1996 Studies
12/31/1996 Lab Work/Physical Studies
12/31/1996 Development, Surface Upgraded road.
12/31/1996 Geology Working away from main deposit area.
12/31/1995 Drilling 133 holes (16,178 m).
12/31/1995 Development, Surface
12/31/1995 Geochemistry Additional sampling.
12/31/1994 Drilling 53 holes, (8,500 m) on main target.
12/31/1994 Geology Detailed mapping over drill target, reconnaissance mapping elsewhere.
12/13/2016 Studies Two, January and November, prepared using JORC rules.
12/13/2015 Pre-existing Data Also digitized data.
12/13/2015 Airphotography Also Lidar survey. Also GPS survey.
12/13/2015 Drilling 99 holes (21,279.7 m) collared for exploration, metallurgical, geotechnical and hydrological purposes.
12/13/2015 Lab Work/Physical Studies Some drill holes collared for metallurgical samples.
12/13/2015 Airborne Geophysics Also magnetic survey.
12/13/2015 Lab Work/Physical Studies Various tests carried out on samples.
12/13/2015 Studies Restart of testing conducted by Cominco, i.e. hydrological, environmental etc.
12/13/2000 Studies Updated mineral resource estimate based on mining both properties together.
12/13/1999 Studies Continued site remediation, and environmental monitoring.
12/13/1996 Geochemistry Working outward from main area.
12/13/1995 Ground Geophysics Also HLEM and gravity surveys.
12/13/1995 Geology
12/13/1994 Studies Preliminary mineral resource estimate.
12/13/1994 Geochemistry Additional sampling.
12/13/1994 Ground Geophysics Also gravity survey.
12/13/1994 Airborne Geophysics Also EM survey.
12/13/1993 Geochemistry Mineralized sulphide cobble discovered.
12/13/1993 Geochemistry Gris sampling over geophysical anomaly.
12/13/1993 Geochemistry Follow-up survey.
12/13/1993 Ground Geophysics Also EM and UTEM surveys undertaken.
12/13/1992 Geochemistry Reconnaissance soil and silt sampling to confirm Geological Survey of Canada's identified anomaly.
12/13/1988 Geochemistry Release of Geological Survey of Canada's regional stream sediment survey.
1/1/1995 Studies Updated mineral resource estimate. Also various engineering, metallurgical, geotechnical, heritage and environmental studies.

Assessment Reports that overlap occurrence

Report Number Year Title Worktypes Holes Drilled Meters Drilled
097150 2017 2017 Geological, Geochemical, Geophysical, Diamond Drilling and Geotechnical Report o the Kudz Ze Kayah (KZK) Property Diamond - Drilling, Soil - Geochemistry, Bedrock Mapping - Geology, EM - Ground Geophysics 48 4928.70
096997 2016 2016 Geological, Geophysical, Diamond Drilling and Geotechnical Program Report on the Kudz Ze Kayah (KZK) Property Magnetic - Airborne Geophysics, VTEM - Airborne Geophysics, Orthophoto - Airphotography, Diamond - Drilling, Downhole Survey - Ground Geophysics, Petrographic - Lab Work/Physical Studies, Research/Summarize - Pre-existing Data, LIDAR - Remote Sensing, Environmental Assessment/Impact - Studies 53 16897.98
096898 2015 2015 Geological, Geophysical, Diamond Drilling and Environmental Report on the Kudz Ze Kayah Property Electromagnetic - Airborne Geophysics, Magnetic - Airborne Geophysics, Diamond - Drilling, Historical Drill Core - Geochemistry, Downhole Survey - Ground Geophysics, Gravity Survey - Ground Geophysics, Surveying - Other, Data Compilation - Pre-existing Data, Process/Interpret - Pre-existing Data, LIDAR - Remote Sensing 99 21279.70
093848 1997 1997 Assessment Report Tag Property (KZK Project) and Cobb Property Diamond Drilling and Minor Geological Mapping and Soil/Rock Geochemistry Diamond - Drilling, Soil - Geochemistry, Bedrock Mapping - Geology, EM - Ground Geophysics, Gravity Survey - Ground Geophysics, Magnetics - Ground Geophysics, Line Cutting - Other 17 3566
093712 1996 1996 Assessment Report Kudz Ze Kayah Property Linecutting, Soil Geochemistry, Geological Mapping, Geophysical Surveying and Diamond Drilling Diamond - Drilling, Regional Bedrock Mapping - Geology, EM - Ground Geophysics, Gravity Survey - Ground Geophysics, Magnetics - Ground Geophysics, Line Cutting - Other, Prospecting - Other 1 99.20

Related References

Number Title Page(s) Reference Type Document Type
YEG1995-pg29 Summary of the Kudz Ze Kayah Project, Volcanic Hosted Massive Sulphide Deposit, Yukon Territory p. 29-32. Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report Paper
YEG1996-pg35 Massive Sulphide Deposits in the Yukon-Tanana and Adjacent Terranes p. 35-45. Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report Paper
YEG2001_18 Finlayson Lake Targeted Geoscience Initiative (southeastern Yukon), Part 2: Quaternary geology and till geochemistry p. 189-217. Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report Paper
YEG1999_06 Syn-mineralization faults and their re-activation, Finlayson Lake massive sulphide district, Yukon-Tanana Terrane, southeastern Yukon Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report Paper
12 Volcanic-associated massive sulphide (VMS) mineralization in the Yukon-Tanana Terrane and coeval strata of the North American miogeocline, in the Yukon and adjacent areas Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Bulletin
1999-4 Geological map of parts of Finlayson Lake area (105G/7, 8, and parts of 1, 2 and 9) and Frances Lake (parts of 105H/5 and 12) map areas, southeastern Yukon Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Open File (Geological - Bedrock)
2001-33 Preliminary bedrock geological map of northern Finlayson Lake area (NTS 105G) Yukon Territory (1:100 000 scale) Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Open File (Geological - Bedrock)
YEG1994 Yukon Exploration and Geology 1994 p. 6, 11-12. Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report
YEG1995 Yukon Exploration and Geology 1995 p. 9, 16, 29-32. Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report
YEG1996 Yukon Exploration and Geology 1996 p. 18, 31. Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report
YEG1997 Yukon Exploration and Geology 1997 p. 11, 36, 38. Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report
YEG1998_OV Yukon Mining & Exploration Overview 1998 p. 8, 20, 28, 30. Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report
YEG1999_OV Yukon Mining & Exploration Overview 1999 p. 21, 30. Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report
YEG2000_OV Yukon Mining & Exploration Overview 2000 p. 7-9, 25. Indian & Northern Affairs Canada/Department of Indian & Northern Development: Exploration & Geological Services Division Annual Report
YEG2015_OV2 Yukon Hard Rock Mining, Development and Exploration Overview 2015 p. 38, 45, 46. Yukon Geological Survey Annual Report Paper

Resource/Reserve

Year Zone Type Commodity Grade Tonnage Amount Reported Amount 43-101 Compliant Cut-off
2016 KRAKATOA ZONE - UPDATED INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated lead 3.1 % 3,700,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KRAKATOA ZONE - UPDATED INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated zinc 7.2 % 3,700,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KRAKATOA ZONE - UPDATED INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated gold 1.8 g/t 3,700,000 6660000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KRAKATOA ZONE - UPDATED INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated silver 211 g/t 3,700,000 780700000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KRAKATOA ZONE - UPDATED INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred copper .8 % 500,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KRAKATOA ZONE - UPDATED INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred lead 1.7 % 500,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KRAKATOA ZONE - UPDATED INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred zinc 8.9 % 500,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KRAKATOA ZONE - UPDATED INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred gold 1.2 g/t 500,000 600000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KRAKATOA ZONE - UPDATED INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred silver 161 g/t 500,000 80500000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 ABM ZONE - UPDATED INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated copper 1 % 14,600,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 ABM ZONE - UPDATED INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated lead 1.6 % 14,600,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 ABM ZONE - UPDATED INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated zinc 6.1 % 14,600,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 ABM ZONE - UPDATED INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated gold 1.3 g/t 14,600,000 18980000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 ABM ZONE - UPDATED INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated silver 132 g/t 14,600,000 1927200000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 ABM ZONE - UPDATED INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred copper 1.5 % 400,000 Yes Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 ABM ZONE - UPDATED INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred lead 1.4 % 400,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 ABM ZONE - UPDATED INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred zinc 4.2 % 400,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 ABM ZONE - UPDATED INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred gold 1 g/t 400,000 400000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 ABM ZONE - UPDATED INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred silver 107 g/t 400,000 42800000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KRAKATOA ZONE - UPDATED INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated copper .6 % 3,700,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM ZONE (Open Pit) Indicated copper 1 % 146,000,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM ZONE (Open Pit) Indicated lead 1.6 % 14,600,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM ZONE (Open Pit) Indicated zinc 6 % 14,600,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM ZONE (Open Pit) Indicated gold 1.3 g/t 14,600,000 18980000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM ZONE (Open Pit) Indicated silver 131 g/t 14,600,000 1912600000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM ZONE (Open Pit) Inferred copper 1.1 % 400,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM ZONE (Open Pit) Inferred lead 1.5 % 400,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM ZONE (Open Pit) Inferred zinc 4.7 % 400,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM ZONE (Open Pit) Inferred gold .9 g/t 400,000 360000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM ZONE (Open Pit) Inferred silver 101 g/t 400,000 40400000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - KRAKATOA ZONE (Open Pit) Indicated copper .5 % 2,100,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - KRAKATOA ZONE (Open Pit) Indicated lead 3.7 % 2,100,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - KRAKATOA ZONE (Open Pit) Indicated zinc 7.6 % 2,100,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - KRAKATOA ZONE (Open Pit) Indicated gold 2 g/t 2,100,000 4200000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - KRAKATOA ZONE (Open Pit) Indicated silver 230 g/t 2,100,000 483000000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - KRAKATOA ZONE (Open Pit) Inferred copper .6 % 3,000,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - KRAKATOA ZONE (Open Pit) Inferred lead 2.9 % 3,000,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - KRAKATOA ZONE (Open Pit) Inferred zinc 7.4 % 3,000,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - KRAKATOA ZONE (Open Pit) Inferred gold 1.6 g/t 3,000,000 74075320.09 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - KRAKATOA ZONE (Open Pit) Inferred silver 202 g/t 3,000,000 606000000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT TOTAL INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated copper .9 % 16,700,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT TOTAL INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated lead 1.8 % 16,700,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT TOTAL INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated zinc 6.2 % 16,700,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT TOTAL INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated gold 1.4 g/t 16,700,000 23380000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT TOTAL INDICATED (Open Pit) Indicated silver 144 g/t 16,700,000 2404800000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT TOTAL INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred copper .7 % 3,400,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT TOTAL INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred lead 2.8 % 3,400,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT TOTAL INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred zinc 7.1 % 3,400,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT TOTAL INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred gold 1.5 g/t 3,400,000 5100000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT TOTAL INFERRED (Open Pit) Inferred silver 191 g/t 3,400,000 649400000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Inferred copper .9 % 13,683,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Inferred lead 1.6 % 13,683,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Inferred zinc 6.1 % 13,683,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Inferred gold 1.4 g/t 13,683,000 19156200 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Inferred silver 140 g/t 13,863,000 1940820000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - TOTAL RESOURCE (Open Pit) Inferred copper .8 % 15,402,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - TOTAL RESOURCE (Open Pit) Inferred lead 1.7 % 15,402,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - TOTAL RESOURCE (Open Pit) Inferred zinc 6.1 % 15,402,000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - TOTAL RESOURCE (Open Pit) Inferred gold 1.4 g/t 15,402,000 21562800 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2016 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - TOTAL RESOURCE (Open Pit) Inferred silver 133 g/t 15,402,000 2048466000 No Yes None
Based on 2015 and 2016 drilling programs conducted by BMC Ltd. Press release November 10, 2016. Prepared in accordance with JORC Code (2012). The Mineral Resource has not been reported above a cut-off grade as the mineralization was modeled primarily by logged massive, semi and stockwork lithologies. These zones correlated to significant grades of copper, lead, zinc, gold and silver. On this basis it was deemed that no cut-off grade was required.
2006 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM & GP4F DEPOSITS (Open Pit) Historical Estimate copper .81 % 12,800,000 No No Unknown
Figure quoted in Teck Cominco and later Teck Annual Reports and Northern Miner volumes. Includes GP4F resource. Same as 1998 resource figure but includes GP4F tonnage. Used from 2006 to 2015 and quoted in BMC Ltd's news release (January 24, 2015) announcing purchase of property. Reported as Inferred resource but figure was never updated to meet NI 43-101 compliance.
2006 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM & GP4F DEPOSITS (Open Pit) Historical Estimate gold 1.38 g/t 12,800,000 17664000 No No Unknown
Figure quoted in Teck Cominco and later Teck Annual Reports and Northern Miner volumes. Includes GP4F resource. Same as 1998 resource figure but includes GP4F tonnage. Used from 2006 to 2015 and quoted in BMC Ltd's news release (January 24, 2015) announcing purchase of property. Reported as Inferred resource but figure was never updated to meet NI 43-101 compliance.
2006 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM & GP4F DEPOSITS (Open Pit) Historical Estimate lead 1.7 % 12,800,000 No No Unknown
Figure quoted in Teck Cominco and later Teck Annual Reports and Northern Miner volumes. Includes GP4F resource. Same as 1998 resource figure but includes GP4F tonnage. Used from 2006 to 2015 and quoted in BMC Ltd's news release (January 24, 2015) announcing purchase of property. Reported as Inferred resource but figure was never updated to meet NI 43-101 compliance.
2006 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM & GP4F DEPOSITS (Open Pit) Historical Estimate zinc 5.9 % 12,800,000 No No Unknown
Figure quoted in Teck Cominco and later Teck Annual Reports and Northern Miner volumes. Includes GP4F resource. Same as 1998 resource figure but includes GP4F tonnage. Used from 2006 to 2015 and quoted in BMC Ltd's news release (January 24, 2015) announcing purchase of property. Reported as Inferred resource but figure was never updated to meet NI 43-101 compliance.
2000 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM OPEN PIT RESERVES (OPEN PIT) Historical Estimate copper .85 % 11,110,000 No No Unknown
Hatch Ltd - Pre-Feasibility Study Volume 1 for Finlayson Project. Prepared for Expatriate Resources. Assumed that Kudz Ze Kayah and Wolverine deposits would be jointly mined to reduce costs. This figure = minable reserve based on pit shell outline and other parameters. Reported Indicated Reserve was higher.
2000 KUDZ ZE KAYAH -ABM OPEN PIT RESERVES (OPEN PIT) Historical Estimate gold 1.33 g/t 11,110,000 14776300 No No Unknown
Hatch Ltd - Pre-Feasibility Study Volume 1 for Finlayson Project. Prepared for Expatriate Resources. Assumed that Kudz Ze Kayah and Wolverine deposits would be jointly mined to reduce costs. This figure = minable reserve based on pit shell outline and other parameters. Reported Indicated Reserve was higher.
2000 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM OPEN PIT RESERVES (OPEN PIT) Historical Estimate lead 1.56 % 11,110,000 No No Unknown
Hatch Ltd - Pre-Feasibility Study Volume 1 for Finlayson Project. Prepared for Expatriate Resources. Assumed that Kudz Ze Kayah and Wolverine deposits would be jointly mined to reduce costs. This figure = minable reserve based on pit shell outline and other parameters. Reported Indicated Reserve was higher.
2000 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM OPEN PIT RESERVES (OPEN PIT) Historical Estimate silver 136.9 g/t 11,110,000 1520959000 No No Unknown
Hatch Ltd - Pre-Feasibility Study Volume 1 for Finlayson Project. Prepared for Expatriate Resources. Assumed that Kudz Ze Kayah and Wolverine deposits would be jointly mined to reduce costs. This figure = minable reserve based on pit shell outline and other parameters. Reported Indicated Reserve was higher.
2000 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM OPEN PIT RESERVES (OPEN PIT) Historical Estimate zinc 5.61 % 11,110,000 No No Unknown
Hatch Ltd - Pre-Feasibility Study Volume 1 for Finlayson Project. Prepared for Expatriate Resources. Assumed that Kudz Ze Kayah and Wolverine deposits would be jointly mined to reduce costs. This figure = minable reserve based on pit shell outline and other parameters. Reported Indicated Reserve was higher.
1998 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Historical Estimate zinc 5.9 % 11,300,000 No No unknown
Cominco and later Teck Cominco annual reports. Most volumes called this Indicated reserve. Some volumes (1998 forward) report 1,500.000 tonnes Inferred reserve which covers GP4F deposit located 5 km to southeast.
1998 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Historical Estimate lead 1.5 % 11,300,000 No No Unknown
Cominco and later Teck Cominco annual reports. Most volumes called this Indicated reserve. Some volumes (1998 forward) report 1,500.000 tonnes Inferred reserve which covers GP4F deposit located 5 km to southeast.
1998 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Historical Estimate copper .9 % 11,300,000 No No Unknown
Cominco and later Teck Cominco annual reports. Most volumes called this Indicated reserve. Some volumes (1998 forward) report 1,500.000 tonnes Inferred reserve which covers GP4F deposit located 5 km to southeast.
1998 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Historical Estimate gold 1.3 g/t 11,300,000 14690000 No No Unknown
Cominco and later Teck Cominco annual reports. Most volumes called this Indicated reserve. Some volumes (1998 forward) report 1,500.000 tonnes Inferred reserve which covers GP4F deposit located 5 km to southeast.
1998 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Historical Estimate silver 133 g/t 11,300,000 1502900000 No No Unknown
Cominco and later Teck Cominco annual reports. Most volumes called this Indicated reserve. Some volumes (1998 forward) report 1,500.000 tonnes Inferred reserve which covers GP4F deposit located 5 km to southeast.
1995 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Historical Estimate lead 1.5 % 11,300,000 No No unknown
Cominco Ltd. Annual report 2006. Also - Summary of the Kudz Ze Kayah Project, Volcanic Hosted Massive Sulphide Deposit, Yukon Territory, by H.C. Schultze - in Yukon Exploration and Geology 1995 p. 29, uses slightly lower tonnage figure, likely a misprint. Lower overall tonnage figure likely reflects loss of underground resources.
1995 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Historical Estimate silver 130 g/t 11,300,000 1469000000 No No unknown
Cominco Ltd. Annual report 2006. Also - Summary of the Kudz Ze Kayah Project, Volcanic Hosted Massive Sulphide Deposit, Yukon Territory, by H.C. Schultze - in Yukon Exploration and Geology 1995 p. 29, uses slightly lower tonnage figure, likely a misprint. Lower overall tonnage figure likely reflects loss of underground resources.
1995 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Historical Estimate gold 1.3 g/t 11,300,000 14690000 No No unknown
Cominco Ltd. Annual report 2006. Also - Summary of the Kudz Ze Kayah Project, Volcanic Hosted Massive Sulphide Deposit, Yukon Territory, by H.C. Schultze - in Yukon Exploration and Geology 1995 p. 29, uses slightly lower tonnage figure, likely a misprint. Lower overall tonnage figure likely reflects loss of underground resources.
1995 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Historical Estimate zinc 5.9 % 11,300,000 No No unknown
Cominco Ltd. Annual report 2006. Also - Summary of the Kudz Ze Kayah Project, Volcanic Hosted Massive Sulphide Deposit, Yukon Territory, by H.C. Schultze - in Yukon Exploration and Geology 1995 p. 29, uses slightly lower tonnage figure, likely a misprint. Lower overall tonnage figure likely reflects loss of underground resources.
1995 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (Open Pit) Historical Estimate copper .9 % 11,300,000 No No unknown
Cominco Ltd. Annual report 2006. Also - Summary of the Kudz Ze Kayah Project, Volcanic Hosted Massive Sulphide Deposit, Yukon Territory, by H.C. Schultze - in Yukon Exploration and Geology 1995 p. 29, uses slightly lower tonnage figure, likely a misprint. Lower overall tonnage figure likely reflects loss of underground resources.
1994 KUDZ ZE KAYAH -ABM DEPOSIT (OPEN PIT & UNDERGROUND) Historical Estimate gold 1.2 g/t 13,000,000 No No Unknown
Preliminary estimate of reserves based on results of 1994 exploration program. Different authors defined it differently, i.e. possible or inferred. Figure not supported by independent engineering report.; George Cross News Letter, 2 Feb/95, p. 2. Also Cominco Ltd 1994 Annual Report, Northern Miner, 30 Jan/95.
1994 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (OPEN PIT & UNDERGROUND) Historical Estimate copper 1 % 13,000,000 No No Unknown
Preliminary estimate of reserves based on results of 1994 exploration program. Different authors defined it differently, i.e. possible or inferred. Figure not supported by independent engineering report.; George Cross News Letter, 2 Feb/95, p. 2. Also Cominco Ltd 1994 Annual Report, Northern Miner, 30 Jan/95.
1994 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (OPEN PIT & UNDERGROUND) Historical Estimate lead 1.3 % 13,000,000 No No Unknown
Preliminary estimate of reserves based on results of 1994 exploration program. Different authors defined it differently, i.e. possible or inferred. Figure not supported by independent engineering report.; George Cross News Letter, 2 Feb/95, p. 2. Also Cominco Ltd 1994 Annual Report, Northern Miner, 30 Jan/95.
1994 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (OPEN PIT & UNDERGROUND) Historical Estimate silver 125 g/t 13,000,000 No No Unknown
Preliminary estimate of reserves based on results of 1994 exploration program. Different authors defined it differently, i.e. possible or inferred. Figure not supported by independent engineering report.; George Cross News Letter, 2 Feb/95, p. 2. Also Cominco Ltd 1994 Annual Report, Northern Miner, 30 Jan/95.
1994 KUDZ ZE KAYAH - ABM DEPOSIT (OPEN PIT & UNDERGROUND) Historical Estimate zinc 5.5 % 13,000,000 No No Unknown
Preliminary estimate of reserves based on results of 1994 exploration program. Different authors defined it differently, i.e. possible or inferred. Figure not supported by independent engineering report.; George Cross News Letter, 2 Feb/95, p. 2. Also Cominco Ltd 1994 Annual Report, Northern Miner, 30 Jan/95.

Drill core at YGS core library

Number Property Year Drilled Core Size Photos Data
K15-254 Kudz Ze Kayah 2015 NQ3 2 4
K15-273 Kudz Ze Kayah 2015 NQ3 6 5
K15-297 Kudz Ze Kayah 2015 HQ3 1 5
94-23 Kudz Ze Kayah 1994 NQ 28 2
94-26 Kudz Ze Kayah 1994 28 1
94-33 Kudz Ze Kayah 1994 NQ 18 1
94-44 Kudz Ze Kayah 1994 36 1